Top-performing cybersecurity products certified in latest comparative tests response: top-performing cybersecurity products certified in latest comparative tests.

  • Reading time:4 mins read
  • Post category:AntivirusDon
  • Post comments:0 Comments
You are currently viewing Top-performing cybersecurity products certified in latest comparative tests response: top-performing cybersecurity products certified in latest comparative tests.
Representation image: This image is an artistic interpretation related to the article theme.

Here are the key results from the AV-Comparatives Business Main-Test Series 2024:

Key Findings

  • Protection against malware: The top-rated security products demonstrated an average detection rate of 9% against malware, with some products achieving detection rates of up to 100%. False alarms: The top-rated products showed a significant reduction in false alarms, with an average of 5% of detected threats being false positives. Performance impact: The top-rated products had a minimal impact on system performance, with an average increase in CPU usage of just 2%. ## Top-Rated Products**

    • Top-Rated Products

  • Kaspersky Total Security: Kaspersky Total Security was the top-rated product in the Business Main-Test Series 2024, with a detection rate of 9% against malware and a false alarm rate of 3%. Bitdefender Total Security: Bitdefender Total Security was the second-best performer, with a detection rate of 8% against malware and a false alarm rate of 4%.

    Top Performers in the AV-Test 2022

    The AV-Test 2022 report has been released, and it’s clear that several top antivirus software providers have delivered exceptional results. In this article, we’ll delve into the top performers in the AV-Test 2022, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses.

    Real-World Protection

    The Real-World Protection test assesses an antivirus software’s ability to detect and block real-world malware threats. In this test, Avast, Bitdefender, Sophos, Cisco, and ESET all achieved exceptional scores, with Avast delivering a flawless performance. Avast’s Real-World Protection score was 100%, indicating that it detected and blocked every single malware sample used in the test. Bitdefender’s score was 99.8%, demonstrating its impressive detection capabilities. Sophos’s score was 99.5%, showcasing its ability to detect and block a wide range of malware threats. Cisco’s score was 99.3%, highlighting its strong performance in this test.

    However, CrowdStrike and K7 showed a slight decrease in protection rates due to the increasing complexity of the malware.

    The Importance of Business Software Security

    In today’s digital landscape, businesses rely heavily on software applications to manage their operations, communicate with clients, and drive revenue. However, with the rise of cyber threats, it’s essential to ensure that business software is secure to prevent data breaches, intellectual property theft, and financial losses.

    The Threat Landscape

    The threat landscape is constantly evolving, with new malware variants and attack vectors emerging daily. Malware can spread through various means, including phishing emails, infected software downloads, and exploited vulnerabilities in software applications.

    Here’s a closer look at the AV-Comparatives testing methodology and the benefits of using their services.

    AV-Comparatives Testing Methodology

    AV-Comparatives is renowned for its thorough and systematic testing approach, which involves a multi-step process to evaluate the performance of various cybersecurity solutions. The testing methodology is designed to provide businesses and consumers with a comprehensive understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of different security products.

    Key Components of the Testing Process

  • Initial Testing: AV-Comparatives begins by testing the security products against a range of malware, including viruses, Trojans, and ransomware. Behavioral Testing: The organisation then conducts behavioral testing to assess the products’ ability to detect and respond to unknown threats. Performance Testing: AV-Comparatives evaluates the performance of the security products in real-world scenarios, including network traffic and system resource usage. * User Interface Testing: The organisation assesses the usability and user experience of the security products, including their ease of installation, configuration, and management.

    AV-Comparatives – Where Security Meets Trust – Unbiased. Transparent. Trusted. Contact: Peter Stelzhammer, e-mail: [email protected], phone: +43 720115542

    • Leave a Reply