A New Era of Internal Loyalty Tests
The firing of NSA and US Cyber Command chief Gen. Timothy Haugh by US President Donald Trump marks a significant shift in the country’s cybersecurity strategy. Rather than focusing on external threats, the administration appears to be using its powerful cyber capabilities to carry out internal loyalty tests. This approach raises concerns about the integrity of the US national security establishment and the country’s ability to defend its allies.
Contextualizing the Firing
Gen. Haugh’s dismissal was part of a broader purge of the national security establishment. Trump had previously received a list of allegedly disloyal officials from far-right activist Laura Loomer, who claimed that Haugh and his deputy, Wendy Noble, were disloyal to the President. This list included several members of the National Security Council, who were allegedly targeted for their perceived ties to former defense officials critical of Trump, as well as their support for internal diversity initiatives.
- US National Security Advisor Mike Waltz was present at the firing table, according to NPR.
- The Trump administration has ordered the removal of over a dozen staffers from the White House National Security Council, many of whom are longtime civil servants, according to The Washington Post.
The Loyalty Test Program
The Trump administration has also established an AI-powered loyalty test program, known as DOGE, which is reportedly used to scan internal messages for political sentiment. This program is not just a domestic issue but reflects a dramatic redefinition of national cybersecurity strategy. It’s a transformation that mirrors the cyber governance of authoritarian regimes, not democratic allies.
“NSA Director Tim Haugh and his deputy Wendy Noble have been disloyal to President Trump,” Loomer wrote in a post on X. “That is why they have been fired.”
The Consequences of This Shift
The consequences of this shift in cybersecurity strategy are far-reaching and threaten the integrity of NATO’s digital defenses, weaken collective deterrence, and deepen the vulnerability of frontline partners like Ukraine.
| Consequence | Impact |
|---|---|
| Threats to NATO’s Digital Defenses | Weakens collective deterrence and compromises Ukraine’s cyber security. |
| Decreased Cybersecurity Cooperation with Allies | Ukraine and NATO allies face intelligence gaps that could compromise deterrence and crisis response. |
| Increased Vulnerability to Russian and Chinese Threats | US cyber leadership in disarray sends a clear signal that Washington’s cyber focus has changed, leaving partners scrambling to protect their networks. |
Turning a Blind Eye
Russia, of course, is watching closely. Intelligence agencies across Europe have reported an uptick in Kremlin-linked hybrid operations, including coordinated phishing attacks, infrastructure probes, and disinformation campaigns. With fewer coordinated pushbacks and delayed intelligence sharing, Russian hackers have more operational space to operate. “All our briefings say that Russia, Iran, China constantly, among others, are trying to breach our cyber defense, and the more we move CISA people who’ve done a good job out of their roles, the more vulnerable we become,” House Homeland Security Committee ranking member Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) told Politico.
The impact on US allies is particularly concerning. US-Ukrainian cyber cooperation has significantly diminished, and several joint cyber training initiatives have stalled or been quietly shelved. This shift in cybersecurity strategy has also led to a decrease in real-time coordination on Russian threats, leaving Ukraine and NATO allies scrambling to protect their networks without American cover. “This administration is unilaterally disarming in the midst of an attack,” Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) told Politico.
